To Conspiratorially Theorize, or Not to Conspiratorially Theorize? That is Not the Question.
I’m amazed at how easily I stumble upon conspiracy theories while simply researching the ways of our modern political world. Today, I found an article detailing how the Obamacare bill prohibits private insurance companies from providing coverage for paid maternity leave. Said article links to what is apparently known as the Jaffe Memo. Said memo is dated 1969 and was provided to the U.S. Government at their behest. It details ways to control/reduce the U.S. population. It starts out rather harmlessly with a column of “Social Constraints” which include “encourage increased homosexuality” and “fertility control agents in water supply.” In the right-hand column, “Social Controls,” it goes a bit further with suggestions like “confine childbearing to only a limited number of adults” and “compulsory abortion of out-of-wedlock pregnancies.” If that doesn’t have your attention, then HERE! HOW ABOUT THIS??? IT’S MESSED UP! To continue…
All this information in itself might present a bit of a “conspiracy theory.” ZOMG, Planned Parenthood is poisoning the water hole! Well, maybe not yet, but we’ve obviously seen some of this play out (encouraging homosexuality, abortion on demand, etc.). It could be that the rest of this nonsense isn’t far behind. I decided to seek the opinions of others. In so doing, I was directed to a series of videos. I admit that, due to time constraints, I’m only on video 11 of 17, but I think I get the gist: Alfred Kinsey was one messed up dude. According to The Kinsey Syndrome, Alfred Kinsey encouraged pedophiles for the sake of his research and, furthermore, paid them. With federal tax dollars (funneled through grants to the Rockefeller Foundation, which donated to the Kinsey Institute, which in turn paid adults to have sex with children as young as two months old…MONTHS!).
Is all this true? There’s enough to cause me concern (a picture of Kinsey hanging out in the Satanic temple of Aleister Crowley, for example). Still, I figured the Kinsey folks deserved a fair shake, so I paid a visit to the Kinsey Confidential Facebook page and asked for their opinion of this damning evidence. Here’s the response I received, verbatim:
No, Kinsey did not do any such observation. The data collected by Kinsey and staff consisted of interviews, only. Some were with parents and teachers though the great majority were adults. We explain Kinsey’s research more thoroughly on this webpage: http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/about/controversy.html
Well, I already knew all this. Kinsey didn’t molest the kids himself, he just interviewed those who did. Good, for a second I thought something was wrong about all this. He interviewed known pedophiles, the usual suspects: parents and teachers and whatnot. Glad they cleared that up. But my conscience remained foggy, so I clicked their link to browse around some. Long story short, it’s pretty much a game of we said/they said. My personal favorite answer of theirs is “No documents were destroyed.” Oh, well OK then. There’s really no way to prove it, but there’s certainly a lot of questionable activities within the Kinsey research methodology. Some of their responses just don’t seem to make much sense. For example:
Kinsey’s colleague, Gebhard, acknowledged they were coordinating with nursery school directors and operators and parents and grandparents of these kids to obtain the so-called research. He admitted they knowingly were collaborating with these people as they molested the children, and were making use of the fruit of the poisonous tree in Kinsey’s research.
That is absolutely false. Kinsey did interview teachers and parents about the children, but in no way encouraged nor tolerated any such behavior.
What? There’s no explanation as to how Kinsey may have proven himself “intolerant” of such behavior. Personally, I’d turn them into police, confidentiality be damned. At their court hearing, I’d hope to ensure they were given a very friendly,well-endowed cellmate. But this all shows just how bizarre Kinsey’s research was to begin with: he was asking whether or not people were sexual beings at birth. Um, wha? Why? That’s more idiotic than the cocaine for monkeys study Obama’s stimulus paid for.
But I’m digressing a bit on Kinsey. The point is there was obviously something fishy going on. And not the good kind of trout/salmon fishy…the bad kind of having sex with children fishy. Evil fishy. In the Kinsey Syndrome videos I watched, there was a quote from Rene Wormser (imagine there’s a dash over the last “e” in her name, to make it seem super fancy). What I discovered is that, in her book Foundations: Their Power and Influence, she dealt not only with the Kinsey Institute, but a whole range of the grant-based organizations (RAND, Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller, at least). I haven’t read her book, and make no pretense of having done so. But I can Bing with the best of them! (Note: Binging is like Googling, but for people who don’t like Google). She also mentioned the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
I’d come across the CFR just recently because a friend questioned Newt Gingrich’s membership in the organization. In researching them, I found a video. It’s from the John Birch Society. They were fighting globalism, and have been doing it since 1958. They stand for American sovereignty and Constitutional rights. They have a pretty small following these days, it seems, so maybe they did something stupid at one point (like getting run by a Klan member, I dunno) but at their inception they stated they were men of all races (and this was in 1958!). Regardless, you’re probably tired of reading by now and, if you’ve actually watched any (much less all) of the videos to which I’ve linked, then God bless ye weary soul.
The general idea, as I understand it, is that there is a movement to tear down America’s Judeo-Christian roots and create a post-modern, global communist Government. Glenn Beck talks about it quite a bit, right? George Soros is a big part of it. The unions and Trumka. Van Jones. Bill Ayers. And, of course, Barack Hussein Obama (yes, I have the balls to use his middle name). So on and so forth. Maybe they do all get together weekly to do those bizarre Skull and Bones rituals. Maybe they don’t. I don’t really care one way or the other, and neither should you. That’s the entire point of this windy post. It doesn’t matter if they all hop around naked on pogo sticks drinking chickens’ blood every other Saturday. Even if they don’t, their ideas are idiotic. There is still, quite obviously, people who think that abusing children is somehow A-OK, so long as it’s in the name of progress. There are obviously people willing to coerce abortion and put sterilizers in the water. These people have more screws loose than Frankenstein’s monster!
Maybe Obama’s just another link in the chain of purposefully ruining America, or maybe he’s just another link in the chain of accidentally ruining America. Who cares? The point is that America is being ruined. If you’re interested in conspiracy theories, then go ahead and watch all the videos I linked to. If you’re not, then don’t. Regardless, we all should realize that something terribly wrong is happening. And if you don’t, then feel free to vacate the premises.
Note to the reader: this post leads into my upcoming one Libertarians: Heart and Soul of the GOP, or Progressive Screw? You’re darned tootin’ that’s provocative! See you soon!
Welly well well…

What’s all this about a new way?
Sorry, I promise to never channel Alex again. But we do have to have a “first post” on the site, so here it is.
Welcome to Liberty Newswire, where we will try to keep our tens of readers abreast of what we think is interesting, funny, or worth checking out when it comes to the US political scene.
Our primary slant is from a libertarian-leaning GOP bias. It that’s a problem for you, let’s get into it. The only rules we have here (so far) is that we keep profanity appropriate (and that means, generally, leave it in your head), we respect the rights of others to disagree, and we bathe regularly.



